[Table of Contents]
[Previous] [Next]
D. R. Dungan
Hermeneutics: A Text-Book (1888)

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS.



CHAPTER I.
INTRODUCTION.
SECTION 1. THE SUBJECT DEFINED. Derived from Hermes, the interpreter of Jupiter; hence
interpretation. Sacred Hermeneutics is the science of interpreting the Scriptures.
1
SEC. 2. GOD EXPECTS US TO USE HIS BOOK IN ORDER TO KNOW HIS WILL. (1) The Bible to
be used as other books. It is plain, but has to be studied. (2) The weakness is with
man. (a) Laws made by wisest men, and yet misunderstood. (b) So it is with creeds.
Words change their meanings. (3) God does not inspire the interpretation. (4) Divine
wisdom has adopted the word-method of revelation.
1
SEC. 3. A CORRECT HERMENEUTICS WOULD GO FAR TOWARD HEALING THE DIVISIONS OF
THE CHURCH. (1) A wrong interpretation is not the only cause of divisions. (2) Selfish
ambition can not be removed by rules of interpretation. (3) All divisions not the result
of ambition. (4) The Bible is not at fault. (5) The method of interpretation is to blame
for much of the inharmony that exists.
5
SEC. 4. A SOUND HERMENEUTICS WOULD BE THE BEST ANSWER TO INFIDEL OBJECTIONS.
(1) The want of it not the only cause of unbelief. (2) But a strong support of unbelief.
8
SEC. 5. WE NEED A SOUND EXEGESIS TO FIND OUR WAY TO HEAVEN. (1) Many
discouraged by conflicting answers. (2) The assurance of pardon is also involved.
9
 
CHAPTER II.
THINGS WHICH HELP US TO UNDERSTAND THE WORD OF GOD.
SEC. 6. THE NEED OF UNDERSTANDING THE THINGS WHICH HELP US TO A KNOWLEDGE OF
THE WORD OF GOD.
12
SEC. 7. GOOD COMMON SENSE IS OF FIRST IMPORTANCE. (1) Though natural, it may be
assisted. (2) The use of the gift in the interpretation of the Scriptures.
12
SEC. 8. FAITH IN THE INSPIRATION OF THE SCRIPTURES HELPS TO UNDERSTAND THEM.
(1) Unbelievers may learn many things about the Bible. (2) But their mental condition
is not favorable. (3) Faith prompts patient investigation.
14
SEC. 9. THE NEED OF MENTAL INDUSTRY. 15
SEC. 10. THE DESIRE TO DO THE WILL OF GOD IS OF GREAT VALUE. 16
SEC. 11. SPIRITUAL PURITY IS A FACTOR. (1) The mind must been rapport with the truth to
be received. (2) Yet even low-minded persons may learn many things about the
Bible. (3) But the gross mind will not apprehend the pure teachings of the Spirit of
God. Men may hear, and not understand; and in answer to the carnal wish God may
send strong delusion, and the god of this world may blind the eyes of the unbelieving.
Men may fall too low for repentance. (4) Every degree in depravity increases the
difficulty of receiving and knowing the truth (1. Cor. ii. 14).
17
SEC. 12. A CORRECT TRANSLATION WOULD CONDUCE TOWARDS A RELIABLE EXEGESIS.
(1) Words anglicised, transferred, but not translated. (2) Wrong translations retained.
(3) Many words have become obsolete. (4) Others have entirely changed their
meaning.
24
SEC. 13. A GENERAL AND THOROUGH EDUCATION NEEDED. (1) This is not all that is
required. (2) Learning is helpful, and never injurious. (3) The mental drill aids the
power to think. (4) A knowledge of one's own language of first importance. (5) An
acquaintance with the original language will greatly assist. (6) A thorough drill in logic
is valuable. (7) Knowledge of contemporaneous history. (8) Familiarity with Bible
lands. By careful study the Bible can be as easily understood as any work of man on
the subject. (9) The customs of the times should be studied.
27
SEC. 14. WE SHOULD EXPECT TO UNDERSTAND THE BIBLE. The opposite of this view has
done much harm.
32
SEC. 15. THE BLESSING OF GOD IS NEEDED. 35
 
CHAPTER III.
THE THINGS THAT HINDER.
SEC. 16. A DESIRE TO PLEASE THE WORLD. (1) Not wrong to please the world to edifying.
(2) But the inordinate desire to please hinders the truth.
36
SEC. 17. THE BIBLE MADE THE PROPERTY OF THE PRIESTHOOD. (1) This has been too much
the thought of the Catholic Church. (2) Protestants have also been culpable. (3) The
authority of great names has been an evil in this respect. (4) They should be used as
aids in study.
37
SEC. 18. USING THE BIBLE TO PROVE DOCTRINES. 39
SEC. 19. MYSTICISM A GREAT HINDRANCE. 39
SEC. 20. MAKING THE BIBLE A BOOK OF WONDERS. 39
SEC. 21. READING WITHOUT EXPECTING TO UNDERSTAND IT. (1) Reading from a sense of
duty. (2) Reading irregularly and without system. (3) Reading only favorite
Scriptures.
40
SEC. 22. INTERPRETING FROM SINISTER MOTIVES. (1) Done to save property. (2) A wish
to please; to continue our customs or introduce new ones. (3) Sectarianism is
responsible for much wrong interpretation. (4) Moral or practical atheism.
42
SEC. 23. THIRST FOR DISTINCTION. 45
SEC. 24. UNDUE EFFORTS TO HARMONIZE THE BIBLE AND SCIENCE A SOURCE OF EVIL. 46
 
CHAPTER IV.
CONCERNING METHODS.
SEC. 25. THE VALUE OF METHOD. (1) Definition of method. (2) Method superior to rule. 48
SEC. 26. WHY METHOD HAS NOT BEEN EMPLOYED. (1) The idea that it must have a
supernatural interpretation. (2) Interpretation regarded as the right of a privileged
class. (3) That it has not been given according to any plan. (4) That the Bible is a
riddle or blind parable. The opinions of Milton and Stuart on that subject. (5) Want
of sound faith. Blackburne's Ch. History.
49
SEC. 27. WRONG METHODS OF INTERPRETATION. (1) Things are sustained by them that all
know to be false. (2) And the Bible made to contradict itself. (3) Have turned over
the Bible to the clergy as a toy. The proving of false and unworthy propositions.
Prof. Phelps' view of the matter.
54
SEC. 28. THE MYSTICAL METHOD. (1) It originated in heathenism. (2) The several
reformations have not entirely removed it. (3) Its evil results are legion--sects,
ignorance, infidelity. (4) The Bible means what it says, or there is no way to
understand it.
58
SEC. 29. THE ALLEGORICAL METHOD. Definition. Treats all as a metaphor. Philo, Clement,
Swedenborg.
60
SEC. 30. SPIRITUAL INTERPRETATION. This is the mystical method enlarged. 62
SEC. 31. THE HIERARCHICAL METHOD. (1) This differs from the others in the assumption of
authority. (2) Interpretation belongs only to the priesthood. (3) It may be carried to
the higher officiary of the church. (4) Yet their decisions have come from the opinions
of the times. (5) Some yet follow the fathers with the same blindness. (6) It makes
the church the authority. (7) It decides orthodoxy by strange tests, such as the
ordeal. (8) It stands in the way of Christian liberty.
64
SEC. 32. THE RATIONALISTIC METHOD. (1) It is nearly the rule of unbelief. (2) The theory
of Strauss, in four unreasonable demands. (3) Other theories of the same kind--
Kant, Baur, Renan, Schenkel, Eichhorn. (4) Further objections to this method. (a)
Presents no new truth. (b) A wrong use of reason-two particulars. (c) It deifies
reason. (d) Reason can decide nothing of itself.
67
SEC. 33. THE APOLOGETIC METHOD. (1) Maintains the absolute perfection of all statements
found in the Bible. (2) It is opposed to the conceded rule--that of knowing first who
speaks. (3) Supposes inspiration to be continual.
71
SEC. 34. THE DOGMATIC METHOD. (1) Noted for (a) assumption, (b) supposing all true
that may be proved. (2) Came into existence during the dark ages. (3) Has been
kept alive by ignorance and credulity, on the one hand, and the desire to rule, on the
other. (4) Began in Catholicism and is continued in Protestantism. (5) Some truth has
been found by it. (6) Not because the Scriptures speak in riddles. (7) It exalts
traditions to an equality with the word of God. (8) Now hinders Christian unity. (9)
The Bible not a book of proof, but the teaching of God to men. Immer's
Hermeneutics. (10) The way doctrines are proved. (11) It finds in the Bible only
what it wishes to find. (12) Liberalism adopts this method.
73
SEC. 35. LITERAL INTERPRETATION. (1) Used by dogmatists generally. (2) Makes all the
Bible literal. Sometimes assumes meanings which the words in question never have.
79
SEC. 36. THE INDUCTIVE METHOD. (1) What is it? Bacon. (2) The law of analogy. (3) All
facts are reported--four particulars. (4) To heed this rule is sometimes difficult. Get
all the facts, if possible; get as many as may be gathered; treat them justly. Test of
Christianity and of certain laws. (5) This method used generally, except in theology.
(a) Blackstone. (b) Witnesses in court. (c) Teachers of science. (d) Political
economists. (e) The Bible recognizes the correctness of this method. (6) Inference
may be used, if legitimate. (a) Abraham and Lot came out of Egypt. (b) The four
kings. (c) King of Jericho, and other kings. (7) Things assumed in the Bible are true.
(a) Man's responsibility. (b) An honest heart needed. (c) His general wants. (8)
Causes understood when results are named. (9) Truth gathered from approved
precedent. Need of caution. How can we know an approved precedent? (10)
Should know what the author was intending to say. (11) All facts must agree in
pointing to a cause. (12)But not to be rejected for want of philosophical probability--
when? (13) The use of negative facts. Need of caution. (14) Arranging causes in the
order of intensity--four illustrations. (15) Can not establish a particular fact from a
general statement.
82
 
CHAPTER V.
THE SEVERAL COVENANTS.
SEC. 37. NEED OF DISCRIMINATING BETWEEN THE COVENANTS. (1) No one understands
his duty without it. (2) May have many things in common, and yet be distinct. (3)
Language under one may explain language under an other. When? (4) Each one is
supposed to be complete in itself.
106
SEC. 38. THE SEVERAL COVENANTS. (1) Covenant with Adam before the fall. (2) After the
fall. (3) With Noah, before the flood. (4) After the flood. (5) With Abraham,
respecting Christ. (6) Concerning land. (7) Of circumcision. (8) Covenant at Mt.
Sinai. Note.--(9) Covenant made by Christ, and sealed with His blood.
112
SEC. 39. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE COVENANT MADE WITH ISRAEL AT SINAI AND THAT
MADE BY CHRIST. (1) Change in the priesthood. (a) Their high priest from the tribe
of Levi. (b) Were sinful. (c) Short lived. (d) Made without an oath. (e) Under the law
of a carnal commandment. (f) Belonged to the law of Moses only. (g) Was not a
ruler. (2) Change in the atonement. (a) In the time of offering. (b) In the priest
officiating. (c) In the blood offered. (d) In the place of the offering. (e) In the results
of the sacrifice. (3) Respecting limitation. That was national and local, but the
covenant of Christ for the whole world, and for all time. (4) They differ in promises.
(5) That written on stones; this on the hearts of the people. (6) All in the New
Covenant first know the Lord. (7) Sins pardoned--remembered no more. (8) Are
born again. (9) In that they worshiped at Jerusalem; in this, anywhere, if in spirit and
truth. (10) That has been abolished; this remains.
122
SEC. 40. HOW CAN WE KNOW WHEN THE COVENANT OF CHRIST BEGAN? (1) Christ lived
and died under the law. (2) His kingdom then spoken of as at hand. (3) Had so
come that men could press into it. (4) But the facts of the gospel had Dot occurred.
(5) The limits of Judaism upon the disciples. (6) Law and priesthood changed at the
same time. (7) New covenant to issue from Zion. (8) The apostles had the keys of
the kingdom. (9) New covenant could not be in force till after the death of Christ.
(10) Christ was to be the corner-stone. (11) After Pentecost, the kingdom spoken of
as being in existence. (12) It was established on the succeeding Pentecost. Six notes
from these facts.
136
SEC. 41. THE TRIAL AS TO THE TIME OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE KINGDOM. (1) If
before death of Christ, two laws at once. (2) Texts which put it later can not be true.
(3) Jewish limits on disciples show that the law was yet in force. (4) If he had been
king here, he would also have been priest. (5) If it existed then it was not set up at
Jerusalem. (6) Nor could Peter have used any keys. (7) Would have been built
before the laying of the corner-stone. (8) And Paul's illustration pass for nothing. (9)
The apostles did not know it was established at the time of the ascension. (10) The
gospel could not have been preached in its fulness before the Saviour rose from the
dead.
154
 
CHAPTER VI.
THE VALUE AND USE OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY IN THE
INTERPRETATION OF THE SCRIPTURES.
SEC. 42. WHO WAS THE WRITER? (1) Was he inspired? (2) Educated? (3) Religiously
prejudiced? (4) What style of writing? (5) What evils would he most likely be
employed against?
156
SSEC. 43. WHO WERE ADDRESSED? (1) Their history? (2) Education? (3) Customs. (4)
Sins peculiar to them? (5) Temptations and liabilities?
162
SEC. 44. WHO ARE SPOKEN OF? Same questions as in Sec. 43, though not as essential. 165
SEC. 45. WHAT KIND OF COMPOSITION? 166
SEC. 46. WHEN WRITTEN? 167
SEC. 47. THE PLACE OF WRITING OR SPEAKING? 169
 
CHAPTER VII.
RULES FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF WORDS AND SENTENCES.
SEC. 48. HOW TO INTERPRET SENTENCES. Rule 1. Always interpret according to the
known purpose of the author. This is observed in history and law. Exception of
incidental remark only apparent.
172
SEC. 49. BUT HOW KNOW THE PURPOSE OF THE AUTHOR? Rule 1. The writer's statement,
or some one else authoritatively stating it. Rule 2. Carefully consider the immediate
context. What is truth? Lovest thou me more than these? Rule 3. The Bible must
harmonize. Objection answered. Rule 4. Compare with other statements of the
author. Rule 5. Compare with statements of others who speak with equal authority.
Rule 6. The use of common sense respecting the things we know, of ourselves.
Caution in the use of this rule. Rule 7. Interpret figurative language by the laws
governing the figures employed.
176
SEC. 50. RULES BY WHICH THE MEANING OF WORDS SHALL BE ASCERTAINED. Rule 1. All
words are to be understood in their literal sense, unless the evident meaning of the
context forbids. Rule 2. Commands generally, and ordinances always, are to be
understood in a literal sense. Rule 3. The literal meaning of a word is that meaning
given it by those to whom it is addressed. But how know that meaning. Rule 4. The
Scriptures are supposed to give to some words meaning which they do not have in
the classics, and therefore the Bible becomes a dictionary of itself. This only partly
true. Rule 5. Words of definite action can have but one meaning. The action,
however, may have different results. Rule 6. The writer's explanation is the best
definition that can be found. Rule 7. The proper definition of a word may be used in
the place of the word. Rule 8. By antithesis. Rule 9. By the general and special
scope. See the plan of the Roman letter. Rule 10. Etymological construction will
many times tell the meaning of the word. Rule 11. The meaning of a word may be
known by other words used in construction with it. Rule 12. The history of a word
has sometimes to be studied. Terry, on the change in the meanings of words. Rule
13. Illustrations or parables give the peculiar meaning sometimes. Who is my
neighbor? Rule 14. In defining a definition, nothing but primary meanings can he
used.
184
 
CHAPTER VIII.
FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE.
SEC. 51. HOW CAN WE KNOW FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE? Rule 1. The sense of the context
will indicate it. Rule 2. When the literal meaning of a word or sentence involves an
impossibility. Rule 3. If the literal makes a contradiction. Rule 4. When the
Scriptures are made to demand that which is wrong. Rule 5. When it is said to be
figurative. Rule 6. When the definite is put for the indefinite number. Rule 7. When it
is said in mockery. Rule 8. By the use of common sense.
198
SEC. 52. RULES FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE. Rule 1. Let the
author give his own interpretation. Rule 2. Should agree with general and special
scope. Rule 3. Compare the figurative with literal accounts of the same things. Rule
4. By the resemblance of things compared. Rule 5. By the use of the facts of history.
Rule 6. Any inspired interpretation or application of the language. Rule 7. We must
be careful not to demand too many points of analogy. Rule 8. Figures are not always
used with the same meaning. Rule 9. Parables may explain parables. Rule 10. The
type and the antitype are frequently both in view at the same time.
203
 
CHAPTER IX.
THE VARIOUS FIGURES OF THE BIBLE.
SEC. 53. THE PARABLE. Its purpose. (1) To reveal truth. (2) Concealing truth from those
who had no right to it. (3) To embalm truth. (4) Cause men to assent to truth.
Interpretation of many parables.
227
SEC. 54. THE FABLE. 244
SEC. 55. THE SIMILE. 246
SEC. 56. SIMILITUDE--a prolonged simile. 249
SEC. 57. THE METAPHOR. 252
SEC. 58. THE ALLEGORY. Several authors. Simple and compound allegories. The allegory of
the two olive trees, in the Roman letter. Twenty-two facts in the interpretation of the
two tables of stone.
258
SEC. 59. METONYMY. 270
SEC. 60. METONYMY OF THE CAUSE. Cause stated, but the effect to be understood. (1)
Father, Son and Holy Spirit mentioned where the result of their work is meant. (2)
Parents put for their children. (3) Authors instead of their writings. (4) Instruments
put for their effects.
271
SEC. 61. METONYMY OF THE EFFECT. The effect named but the cause meant. 276
SEC. 62. METONYMY OF THE SUBJECT. (1) The subject put for the adjunct. (2) The
container put for the contained. (3) The possessor, for the thing possessed. (4) The
subject named, whereas something consequent thereupon, or connected therewith, is
intended. (5) The thing signified put for the sign. (6) Actions said to be performed
where only permitted or foretold. (7) Actions said to have been accomplished when
only an occasion was given. (8) A statement made as complete when the thought is
only comparative.
278
SEC. 63. METONYMY OF THE ADJUNCT. (1) An accident, or an addition to the subject
mentioned, whereas the subject was meant. (2) The thing contained put for the
container. (3) Time put for the things that occur or happen. (4) Things spoken of
according to appearance, opinions, or claims made for them. (5) Faith or feeling put
for that which occasioned it. (6) A sign is put for the thing signified. (7) The names of
things put for the things.
291
SEC. 64. SYNECDOCHE. (1) The whole is put for a part. (2) A part put for the whole. (3)
Time is put for a part of it. (4) The plural put for the singular. (5) The singular put for
the plural--eat, walk, shoot, etc. (6) A large number for many. (7) A general name is
put for a particular name. All flesh--Canaanites. (8) Sometimes a special name or
word is put for a general. Many put for all.
300
SEC. 65. PROVERB. Webster, Bacon, Wycliffe. Three features of value. How interpreted? 314
SEC. 66. IRONY. How known. Statement of the author. Tone. Character of the speech.
Extravagance. The opinion of those who were present.
316
SEC. 67. SARCASM. Relation to irony. 318
SEC. 68. HYPERBOLE. Webster. Oriental custom. 320
SEC. 69. THE APOSTROPHE. Its origin. Address to the inanimate world--to absent or dead
persons.
322
SEC. 70. PERSONIFICATION. Inanimate things spoken of as animate. 324
SEC. 71. INTERROGATION. Used to affirm or deny with emphasis. 326
SEC. 72. PROLEPSIS. Webster, Bishop Bramhall, Theobald. Scripture use. 329
SEC. 73. PARALLELISM. Its meaning and use among the ancients. 332
SEC. 74. SYNONYMOUS PARALLELISM. (1) Identical. (2) Similar. 335
SEC. 75. ANTITHETIC PARALLELISM. (1) Simple. (2) Compound. 337
SEC. 76. SYNTHETIC PARALLELISM. (1) The corresponding. (2) Cumulative. (3)
Descendent. (4) Irregular.
338
 
CHAPTER X.
FIGURES OF THOUGHT.
SEC. 77. ANTITHESIS. Webster. Scripture use. 346
SEC. 78. SYMBOLS. Meaning. Difference from the type. 349
SEC. 79. THE MIRACULOUS SYMBOLS. 350
SEC. 80. MATERIAL SYMBOLS. Symbols that merge into types Metaphor in action. 351
SEC. 81. VISIONAL SYMBOLS. 353
SEC. 82. SPECIAL RULES FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF SYMBOLS. Rule 1. Interpretation of
the author. Rule 2. Other symbols interpreted by divine authority. Rule 3. Compare
with clear language on the same subject. Rule 4. The names of symbols are to be
understood literally. Rule 5. Resemblance between the symbol and the thing signified.
Rule 6. The meaning that would be put upon it by those for whom it was intended.
355
SEC. 83. TYPOLOGY. Discourse about types. Defined by Webster. South. (1) Original
meaning of the word. (2) Not the same as the antitype. (3) Given usually for one
purpose only. (4) Must foretell something. (5) Must have been so intended. (6) The
Scriptures should interpret them, if possible. (7) They have not descanted upon all
types. (8) Similarity between type and antitype must be apparent. (9) Types were
real persons or things. (10) Antitype always superior. (11) Sometimes figurative
language employed in presenting the type. (12) Rules for symbols will apply.
359
SEC. 84. SEVERAL KINDS OF TYPES, (1) Persons. (2) Things. (3) Institutions. (4) Offices.
(5) Conduct. (6) Events. (7) Places.
362
 
CHAPTER XI.
PROPHECY.
SEC. 85. THE DUTY OF THE PROPHET. Webster's definition. (1) Left to Hebrews and
Christians at last. (2) The prophetic office. Philip's commentary. (3) The prophet as a
historian. (4) Called prophets who interpreted the Scriptures.
370
SEC. 86. DIFFERENT WAYS IN WHICH PROPHECY WAS DELIVERED. (1) History written
beforehand. (2) The future foretold in figurative language. (3) Peculiarities of the
prophets apparent in their writings. Sometimes the thoughts too high for them, when
God takes charge of the wording. (4) Much of their language literal.
374
SEC. 87. THE CHARACTER OF THE PROPHETS. (1) God has employed the best men he could
find. (2) They were good men for any age. (3) Women prophesied. (4) Guilt of
pretending to the gift when not true.
378
SEC. 88. SCRIPTURAL ACCOUNT OF THE FULFILLMENT OF PROPHECIES. 383
SEC. 89. NEW TESTAMENT PROPHECIES, AND THEIR FULFILLMENT. Revelation in its
fulness. Joel's prophecy fulfilled on Pentecost. Seven features in that vision.
Prediction of the Saviour. The foundation of the church. What the prophets foretold
about Christ, and how these predictions were fulfilled. Sixty statements with exact
fulfillment.
388
SEC. 90. PROPHECIES CONCERNING CHRIST. 394

 

[HATB 3-15]


[Table of Contents]
[Previous] [Next]
D. R. Dungan
Hermeneutics: A Text-Book (1888)