HISTORY

    "The tragedy of this century is the rape of the Restoration movement which was inaugurated to promote the unity of all believers, by the party spirit. . . In our fervency to rid the world of religious division, we have become one of the worst divided religious movements; in our zeal to overthrow sectism we have become sectarian."1

   "The disciple brotherhood is fractured into more than two dozen splinter parties, each with its unwritten creed and its special tests of fellowship. Each one of these claims to be the church, whole and entire, perfect and wanting nothing; each regards the others as factions."2

   "Even the casual reader must recognize the fearful plight of those who are 'the New Testament Church'. There is no prospect for improvement. The future holds out for these factions more strife, division, and multiplication of self-righteous partisanship. This is the fruit of carnality, of legalism and unwritten creedalism, of pride and the party spirit. How can they unite the world in Christ, while carving his body into bits? It is time for those who can do so to rise above this wicked spirit and demonstrate a love that transcends all human walls and barriers, so its warmth may dispel the chilling frost of hate. "3

   "It is the essence of sectism that it measures everything by the knowledge accumulated and crystallized in the past. The interpretations, explanations, and opinions, arrived at by godly, consecrated, but fallible men, in yesteryear, become the criterion by which the worth of all contemporary reasoning must be judged. . . Dissenters, although honest, are labelled and harassed, and eventually bounded out as heretics. This has been the tragic history of sectism in all ages. "4

   "Any person who studies earnestly the history of events related to the restoration movement must reach the conclusion that division is like war in that it constantly shifts the ground of our problems but never solves them. . . It is a fact that division between brethren is nowhere sanctioned in the sacred scripture as a remedy for our ills. It is the most widely practiced procedure but it is without any scriptural authority."5

   "We are victims of our own philosophy. That philosophy was not so much derived from scriptures as it was contrived to meet what we regarded as abuses in the sectarian world. In our attempt to avoid and overthrow sectarianism we have been betrayed into becorning sectarian."6

   "Any theory or system which embodies division among the believers as a necessary part of its constitution must be both unscriptural and anti-scriptural. The doctrine of defense by disunity, of preservation by separation, or of faithfulness by fission, is unknown to the divine revelation given to the members of the one body. God does not demand unity of the believers in one passage and sanction their fragmentation in another."7

   "We are divided because we have inherited a philosophy of maintaining doctrinal purity by division among brethren."8

   "The introduction of instrumental music provided for us the first real opportunity to exercise the will to divide, based on the false philosophy that the way to preserve doctrinal purity is to separate from brethren. When men are motivated by such an attitude they are doomed to division, and we will continue to divide, using first one thing and then another as an excuse..."9

   "...it seems to me there are three tragic results which have accrued from our initial division.
   1. We have rendered our plea for unity of all believers impotent and ineffective...
   2. We were betrayed into adoption of the fallacious philosophy that purity of doctrine can only be preserved by separation...
   3. We became inoculated with the deadly virus of the party spirit..."10

   "I do not minimize our differences nor suggest that we ignore them. I do not affirm that our doctrinal discussions are unnecessary or unwarranted. I do assert that when we split and sever, when we fragment and fractionalize the body into splinters and segments, and thus weaken our mutual testimony, we are 'disobedient unto the heavenly vision' and we do 'despite unto the Spirit of grace.' Nothing which is not of sufficient importance to sever us from God should ever separate us from each other."11

   "Have our fathers in a previous age of debate and controversy projected their views and interpretations as the will of God, and saddled us with a system which makes our plea for unity the butt of ridicule among thinking and perceptive people?"12

   "Our only approach to differences has been division, and our only approach to division has been sectarian debate. In spite of the fact that every time the Spirit mentions division in the family of God it is condemned, we could not be more divided if the word of God commanded and enjoined it."13

   "Is the schism which we damn in others to be applauded in us? If we can plead with others to go back beyond their divisions to the apostolic proclamation as the hope of unity why can we not go back beyond ours to the same great rallying point, the cross of Jesus?"14

   "We are divided over everything from how to pass the Lord's Supper to the saints to how to take the gospel to the lost."15

   "When we consider the love and forbearance manifested toward Corinth, our own course of procedure should cause us to be ashamed to live and afraid to die. To fragment the body of God's dear Son over such trivia as instrumental music, cups, classes and colleges, is a sin against God, a reflection upon the revelation, and a tragedy of the deepest dye, when considered in the light of sacred scripture."16

   "Schisms among God's people are caused by their attitude toward each other. Things produce strains upon our relationship, but we produce the schisms within it. We separate when we quit loving each other. "17

   "...no man is a liberal' or an 'anti' because of where he stands, but because of where we stand as we look at him. The most extreme 'anti' to one is the most flagrant liberal' to another."18


History

1Nov., 1959, pp. 2,3
2Aug., 1959, p. 10
3June, 1960, p. 12
4Dec., 1960, p. 9
5Dec., 1961, p. 9
6Mar., 1962, p. 13
7April. 1962, p. 3
8Aug., 1962, p. 7
9Aug., 1963, p. 124
10Aug., 1964, headings only, see p. 115
11Sept.. 1964, p. 135
12Feb., 1968, p. 25
13Jan., 1972, p. 11
14Feb., 1968, p. 25
15Sept., 1967, p. 130
16Mar., 1972, p. 42
17Aug., 1963, p. 124
18Sept. 1967, p. 132

CONTENTS

INSTRUMENTAL MUSIC