Thoughts on Fellowship
W. Carl Ketcherside
[Page 5] |
[Page 6] |
What is generally true of the religious world is also applicable to the various factions in the disciple brotherhood. As a case in point we mention the controversy over the use of mechanical instruments in public worship, in which some of the arguments in its defence are about as ridiculous as some of those used by its opponents. Both groups have gone to the Book to confirm their respective positions. They found that for which they were looking. On the subject of "fellowship" even wider divergence is found among the two dozen splinter groups, few of whom even take the time to find out what God meant by the term.
A short time ago I wrote a prominent leader in a faction which makes a test of fellowship out of the matter of grouping students to instruct them in the word of the Lord. I presented to him a hypothetical case as follows. There is one brother in a congregation who does not think it is right to have classes to study the word of the Lord. All of the other members have a deep conviction that it is right and proper to do so. The elders go to the dissenting brother and express their regard for him and their respect for his personal views. They encourage him to come and participate in the corporate worship and mutual edification, and assure him that no reflection will be made against him if he waits to come until the classes are concluded. They confirm their love for him as a brother.
I asked the brother who is a factional leader these questions. What would you advise this brother to do? What scriptural basis would you give for such advice? He replied that he would advise the man to leave the congregation, call for a "loyal" preacher, and try to establish a "faithful" church. In the event that none of the members of the "disloyal" group would come out and take their stand, he would advise the man to move off to a locality where he could worship with a "loyal church." And as a basis for this conglomerate scheme he cited just one scriptural text -- 2 Corinthians 6: 14-18.
Brethren, regardless of your position on grouping students to study the sacred oracles that is sectarianism gone to seed! This preacher, in spite of his protestation of "loyalty" is slashing the body of God's Son to pieces. He is giving counsel which may destroy the souls of those who heed it, and is actually doing despite to the Spirit of grace. And he demonstrates his utter ignorance of the very basis he quotes for his divisive advice. We propose an investigation of this scripture which has provided a weapon for carving the church of God into bloody ribbons. "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? and what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you."
Nothing is clearer to the honest student of God's word than the fact that the primitive disciples of our Lord regarded themselves as a community of saints, separated from unbelievers and idolaters by faith in the Messiah as the hope of their salvation. Through the bond of this faith in Him, they were linked together as a family having God for their Father. They constituted a temple or shrine in which dwelt the living God. Their faith in Jesus as the Messiah, the Son of God, constituted the basis of their communal life. The believers were not always agreed among themselves, as witness the congregation at Corinth, but those in Christ who disagreed were not "unbelievers" and were not so designated.
There were two great communities upon earth. One was the church, the other was composed of the pagan world. The first was a koinonia of light, because God is
[Page 7] |
Each of these communities had its sacrifices. Each expressed its fellowship by communal acts. Since eating and drinking together was an open manifestation of fellowship, this came to be the symbol of the mystic bond which united them. One temple sacrificed to God; the other to idols. One temple brought man into sacred unity with heaven; the other into fellowship with the demons who motivated the idolatry. The apostle writes: "What say I then? that the idol is anything, or that which is offered in sacrifice to idols is anything? But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to demons, and not to God: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with demons. Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of demons: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of demons" (I Cor. 10:20, 21). Be sure to note the usage of the terms "fellowship" and "partakers."
We are now prepared to note the passage in 2 Corinthians 6: 14-18. The admonition to "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers," has no application whatsoever to any alliance or association between members of two branches, or sects, in Christendom. It is not even related to the question of whether a member of "The Church of Christ" ought to marry a Baptist, or buy a filling station in partnership with a Methodist. It certainly has nothing to do with whether a girl from a "one cup congregation" should date a boy in a "cups congregation" as the distinction is so naively made by some of the brethren. Regardless of whether or not such ought to happen, it was not the purpose of the Holy Spirit to suggest it here, and some of the more common applications made of the passage would be downright amusing, if it were not for the serious fact that factional leaders, with more ambition for personal power than love for unity in Jesus, cram such thoughts down the theological throats of gullible and unsuspecting partisans, who, in their ignorance, defeat the very purpose of the cross, and do it under the guise of "loyalty" to Him whom they crucify afresh and put to an open shame.
What does the passage mean? The koinonia of heaven is expressed by the terms righteousness, light, Christ, believer, and temple of God. The koinonia of the underworld is expressed by the terms unrighteousness, darkness, Belial, infidel, and idols. There is a community attached to the Christ. It includes the angels of heaven and the men on earth who have acknowledged Him as their prince. There is another community presided over by Belial. It includes the demons of hell and those on earth who are idolaters, refusing to acknowledge the sovereignty of God in their lives. There can be no more fellowship between these communities than there is between their respective princes. They have nothing in common! So long as God lives in us and walks in us, we cannot participate in idolatrous practices, rites and services.
What is meant by the expression "Come out from among them, and be ye separate and touch not the unclean thing?" This is the handle that fits every factional tool ever devised. It has been used by spiritual demagogues to split and splinter those, who met and worked together for years. It has been made the agent for separation, heartache and tears, and in many localities has clobbered the milk of human kindness, and inspired such gall and bitterness, that those who once sat together at the Lord's Table, have set up rival tables,
[Page 8] |
Does this mean that when my Baptist neighbor, who is so kind, generous, and friendly, invites me to go listen to his preacher in a special meeting, that I must draw the garments of my self-righteousness closer about me, to keep from being defiled by his touch, and insult him, because he does not know that I am to "be separate and touch not the unclean thing?" What is the unclean thing? Is it a Bible class for little children, individual cups, fermented wine, a special way of breaking the loaf, colleges, orphan homes, etc.? Remember, the preacher to whom I posed the question about the brother who did not believe in classes, would advise him to try and rend a congregation at peace among themselves in Christ, and this was the scripture he gave for dividing believers in the Lord! To him "the unclean thing" was a system of grouping students to teach them to develop faith in the Christ! Could ever a more damaging, destructive idea be advanced than that which would take the word of God and completely ignoring its purpose, use it in such a manner as to shatter the body of the Lord? This is carving the body of Jesus into bits with the sword which he furnished us to subdue an alien world.
The unclean thing which we are not to touch, refers to the contaminating lust and vice associated with the impure mystery religions of idolatry. The term is not even remotely related to differences among brethren as to interpretation of various scriptures. It would be impossible to describe the degradation and degeneracy growing out of the idolatrous worship, and believers in the Christ are to have nothing to do with such practices or those who engage in them. "What agreement hath the temple of God with idols?"
Even though modern sectism is deplorable, it is still a condition existing among believers in the Christ. Our opposition to it must not be based upon the idea that our religious neighbors are infidels or idolaters, motivated by a voluntary love and attachment to Belial. My Baptist and Methodist friends are firm believers in the truth that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God. They are certainly mistaken about certain items contained in His will, and they have exalted their love for a party above their love for a unity of all believers. But to quote the verses under consideration and apply them to those who are of a different order in Christendom, for the purpose of forbidding association, even in order to reason with and teach them, is to make of us the most rabid of all sectarians. These people do not constitute a realm of "darkness" or "unrighteousness" as the terms are used here. Many of them live above moral reproach and have never engaged in filthy or immoral conduct because of idolatrous leanings. They are frequently good examples in moral behavior for some of their rabid attackers. It ill becomes a preacher who is carrying on an affair with another man's wife, to get on the radio and slash away at others of the religious community as sectarian and in "darkness" when their lives are a credit to his!
Every honest, sincere believer in the Messiahship of Jesus of Nazareth, is my brother, either in prospect or in fact. If such a believer has submitted to immersion on the basis of his faith in Jesus, he is my brother in reality, a child of God, and a member of his family. He may not have understood all of the blessings accruing from baptism into the Christ, and he may even have been mistaken as to the time of the bestowal of some of them, but his ignorance of effect or time will not nullify God's grace or promise, if he surrenders his will to that of the Messiah. Since his birth, he may be in error about many things pertaining to his responsibility, worship or service, and he may require a tremendous amount of teaching and adjustment, but he is still my brother, and I will teach him as a brother, and not count him as a pagan or an infidel. If our hearts are both honest we will grow ever closer to each other as we both "grow in grace and knowledge of the truth." The transformation in our lives through conformity to the life of the Christ, will pro-
[Page 9] |
Not all believers have been immersed. What shall be my attitude toward those who are in that state? It will be the same as the attitude of a family toward an unborn child. We do not revile, castigate or belittle a child in the womb. We rejoice that it has been conceived, and with an air of expectancy prepare for its arrival. So I shall labor to aid those who have been conceived by faith, to come to birth and full delivery into the glorious fellowship of the sons of God. If they die before delivery I shall mourn our loss; if they are born again I shall seek to nurture, strengthen and support them until they can walk alone. To this I am dedicated, believing it is the will of Him whose slave I have become.
(Next month we will give attention to other scriptures which we have previously misused and misapplied in our misguided sectarian zeal. Our intent is to know the truth which makes men free free from superstition, ignorance, the party spirit, and all that will hinder the free reign of Jesus in our hearts).